Register  |  Username : Password :
Seshin Bike Co

General

Re: Nintendo wii

Reply New Thread

<< Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next >>

Related Searches:

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 4244
Location: New Orleans, ya heard me

Date: 2007-01-02 22:57:20 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

Socal_Rider, to really be sold on the controller (Wiimote?) you have to use it for a few hours. Seriously, there is a novelty at first, but just like the analog stick on the N64, it becomes natural. In same cases, it adds a fun new dimension. Before you right it off, you really have to try it. And not just for a few seconds at a GameStop kiosk. "If the wii fails, you might as well kiss your precious Nintendo goodbye. Nintendo would be delegated to only making games like Sega and probably hand held gaming devices like the gameboy. " 1. Nintendo raised it's profit forcast for 2006/07 by 20% 2. The GameCube doubled Nintendos market share (from 19% to 37%) 3. Nintendo still holds the largest share of the market, mostly because of it's hand-helds. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. Stop hating.


Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 805
Location: San Diego, SoCal

Date: 2007-01-03 13:39:20 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

LOL!! Don't worry Jowee, I'm not hating on Nintendo. I actually want all of the consoles to do well, not just Sony's. For me, competition is good and it adds variety. I just don't like fanboys who join the bandwagon and bash a respectable company that really pushed video games to a mature level. Nintendo and Sega pushed video games for years but both still catered to the younger audience...although, Sega had a more mature image than Nintendo back in the day.

The wiimote isn't Nintendo's first push at being innovative...remember "The Glove" or the robot? Sure, the wiimote seems great right now, but I'm thinking long term. When the novelty of waving the controller around wears off, or the lack of innovations developers have with their Wii games, what's left? Developing an innovative game today is so much harder than before. A lot of games today are rehash of what's been done before. Western developers often lack the quirkiness of Japanese developers. Look at Elite Beat Agents for the Nintendo DS. Cool game for that handheld which takes rythem games in a new direction using the stylus. If Nintendo can support the Japanese developers, then yes, you will see the return of the Big N on top. I, for one, always value gameplay over graphics. However, games with great graphics also enables me to get sucked into a game. I guess what I'm trying to say is...Nintendo needs to do more to keep the novelty of the wiimote fresh. Trust me, I'm not writing off the Wiimote just yet...I guess I'm still waiting on the must have title for the Wii. As much as Twilight Princess appeals to me, I can wait to play that game as I'm still trying to finish all the PS2 games that's come out the last few months.

As for my PS3, I wanted to play Resistance and watch Blu Ray movies. I wanted something I can use to take advantage of my HDTV. Cause once you watch something in HD, it's hard to go back to watching anything less. You kind of get spoiled to it but when you spend so much for entertainment, you want to use its full potential. Sure, I could have bought into the HD DVD addon for the 360, but when you add that all up, the price of the 360 with HD DVD is comparible to the PS3(60 Gig). And with the 360, you get a smaller hard drive and no WiFi. But I'll admit, I'm hoping that Blu Ray becomes the next standard for HD content...so there's a little bias from me there. Hey, I didn't say I wasn't biased. ;)

I don't doubt Nintendo's ability to be profitable. They're the only company making money off of every hardware sold. As for home consoles vs handhelds, I tend to put those in seperate categories. I just find it funny when Nintendo fans bash Sony for using proprietary technology. Nintendo has been guilty of that several times already! Whether it's the cartridge format, unwillingness to use the CD/DVD format for their Gamecube, weird audio/video connections from their consoles, etc. It's just a little hypocritical if you asked me. But going back to your numbers, sure, Nintendo looks very profitable but I'll tell you this, when it comes down to looking at my software library, the number of Gamecube and N64 games pale in comparison to all my other games for my Dreamcast, PS1, PS2, and Xbox. For me, Nintendo doesn't release the kind of games I would find myself getting into. But they are great at pushing kids' games which is the bulk of their profitability. Granted, I enjoy ed Windwaker, Metroid Prime, and Resident Evil 4 on my Gamecube. Other than those titles, I have to think hard and even then, I still can't come up with other games I enjoyed on it. Again, until Nintendo can deliver the kind of games I like to play on it, I won't buy into it right now.

As for Nintendo going the way of Sega...I don't think that'll ever happen. First of all, Sega had a way of pissing off their japanese market/developers. With all the addons, new consoles that went unsupported, that alone killed it for them. Although I loved my Dreamcast(and still do), the coming of the PS2 was the one that sealed their fate.

It will definitely be interesting to see how things play out in the new year. Sony is far behind Nintendo and Microsoft. It doesn't look like they're gaining much momentum but hopefully they come back. Sony is lucky they still have the PS2. There's still some great games coming out for it! Until they can solve the production issues, lower the cost of production, improve their online features, work out the kinks with HDTV compatabilities, release more Blu Ray movies, release the AAA titles it's banking on, and decrease the price of the PS3, only then will the price of the PS3 be justified. But again, those are some tough hurdles to overcome. And as optimistic as I am for the PS3's features, I'm equally worried for it too.

Xbox will always be there so there's not much to say about them. Only thing left for MS to do is to support Japanese developers more. I hope the coming of Blue Dragon will convince them that there's a market for that kind of game. First person shooters, sandbox type games, and racers seem to be getting a bit stale.


MySpace Profile: SoCal Rider

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 2999
Location: somewherenearcleveland

Date: 2007-01-03 16:01:43 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

most video games these days are just rehashes of old shit... just more polished shit... gta style games have gotten stale... those tony hawk games have gotten stale.... fighting games have gotten stale... first person shooters have gotten stale... people are sick of the same crap with better graphics... Nintendo is the only one looking to resolve that. The remote draws you into the game more. it really does add to the game play. You can do a lot more with it... the 360 will win this time around I know that... its inevitable that the ps3 end up like the sega dreamcast.... too few users to support the developers = no more games...
sony may have a decent list of games that are coming out... but the console sales will have to be there for those developers to continue anything more than that....
and as for blue ray winning the format war... I don't honestly see blue ray or hddvd going anywhere... I think these are more experimental formats like minidisc than anything... I don't think the vast majority of people will dive into either of them enough to make them a standard in house holds...
Keep in mind there were some systems that had some bad ass games out for them... but never took off due to their price...sega cd, neo geo, 32x.... games don't always help if people just aren't willing to buy the system...


I'll support dans comp till bmx companies start selling direct to their customers...

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 485
Location:

Date: 2007-01-03 17:50:18 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

"The GameCube doubled Nintendos market share (from 19% to 37%) 3. Nintendo still holds the largest share of the market, mostly because of it's hand-helds."



Really??  I would like to hear the explanation behind that please.


NES=60 million units
Super Nintendo=49 million units
N64=33 million
Game cube=22 million


ps1=101 million
ps2=105 million

The GC sold almost 11 million less than the N64 but managed to increase Nintendo' s market share by 20%????  LOL please explain that to me.  Did millions of people suddenly stop buying video games?

Even if you add up how many DS's GC's N64's SNES  NES's and Wii's nintendo sold that still doesn't even add up to as much as how many  PS1's and PS2's sony has sold. 

Nintendo definitely owns the hand held video game console market, that is undisputed.  But that just proves once again that Nintendo caters to a younger audience.  How many 18-30 year old guys do you see going around playing a gameboy or DS? None.  The ones playing those are in grade school.  Nintendo really needs to get its act together with the WII.  The best selling video games always are and always will be sports games.  No one can argue with the fact that sports games on Nintendo have been piss poor for a long time; sports titles sold by EA etc. have always sold FAR FAR less on nintendo consoles than on PS and XBox and even Sega Genesis.  Why?  Because Nintendo users mostly support 1st party games like Zelda, Mario, etc.  Many video game players who are older will simply choose a 360 or PS3 simply because of the sports titles alone.    Nintendo had some 3rd party support like the Resident evil series and Perfect dark, but look what happened.  Nintendo shit the bed and lost those gigantic titles to other systems.  The Perfect Dark for the 360 was probably one of the best games of '06.  


As for the wii mote, only time will tell if it is successful or if it was a gimmick.  Crap like this has been tried before like the fishing rod for Sega Bass fishing, the power glove, guns for shooter games, driving wheels with gas and brake pedals for driving games, but all those ended in massive failures.  The wiimote really isn't that innovative or revolutionary like nintendo fanboys claim,  game makers have been there and tried that before. 

Listen, it  isn't that I hate Nintendo simply because it is Nintendo, I just hate how Nintendo tries to go it alone with their games and pretty much relies solely on its 1st party games (which a lot of the times are for young kids).   Why don't you actually take a look at the reviews of the games aimed at older audiences that were mentioned in this thread.  they all pretty
 much have gotten extremely poor reviews.  Nintendo was great back in the day of NES and SNES, but Nintendo got stale quickly once they started to ignore the older audiences when teh N64 rolled around. 


http://sis.slowli.com/images/4kv8te.gif

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 805
Location: San Diego, SoCal

Date: 2007-01-03 18:23:20 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

Again, I think it's way too early to claim that the "too few users" problem will sway developers from making games on the PS3. Wii selling more than PS3s...sure, simply cause there was more in stock and the price was in the toy range. But once people who recently bought HDTVs feel like they need more to push what their TV can do, you can bet that they'll be looking towards the newer technologies.

From a developer's standpoint, Sony is excellent in supporting their efforts. I don't think that's changed with the release of the PS3. Again, I think a lot of people are caught up with hating on Sony. Honestly, I think people have convinced themselves that they will never own a PS3 and will never pay so much for a system so why not hate on Sony for not making it so easily accessible? People will buy into technology when it shows/proves it can deliver the goods. When people who bought their 1080p HDTVs realize it'll be a long while before we get 1080p broadcasts, they'll look towards the Blu Rays and HD DVD. At which point, the PS3 will look very attractive to them because they get a next gen media format as well as a next gen gaming console all in one. Again, this is what the Sony execs hope will happen and what they are counting on in the long run.

I'll admit, at one point in time, I was happy with my upscaling DVD player. But you'd be kidding yourself if you can honestly say you can't see a difference between an upscaled DVD vs. Blu Ray or HD DVD. Mind you, since the formats are still new, you still find direct translations which do not take advantage of the HD features. But watching Superman Returns on the PS3 on Blu Ray left me smiling cause the picture quality was so much better. Now, any DVD I watch seems flat and grainy.

As for the other systems you mentioned, you can't take those without looking at the industry back then. Sega CD...failed because developers didn't jump onto the medium as quickly and the kind of games being developed didn't take advantage of the storage capacity. They were still stuck trying to make games on cartridges which had its advantage over the CD medium...no load times. The Neo-Geo...well, too expensive for both console and games and was a niche market because not everyone could afford a direct port of expensive arcade machines. Sure, the Neo-Geo was priced at around $500-600 dollars, but if you were to compare that to the cost of the PS3 now along with inflation, you'll see that the Neo-Geo was priced waaaay too much for what you were getting. And games selling for nothing less than $100?!?! That's just crazy. The 32X? Well, good concept to try and keep up with the evolving 3D games, but wasn't well supported because soon after that, Sega put its focus on the Saturn. That burned developers as well as consumers. It's too bad because I bought both the Sega CD and 32X addon...I still have them too! :D

For the price, I really do think you're getting a lot for the PS3. Am I buying into potential...sure, maybe. But I do know I'm using all the features the PS3 has to offer me right now: Decent FPS game with Resistance, using the Wi-Fi feature too play online with, watching Blu Ray movies, downloading demos to test out future games, using my HDTV to its full potential...how can I be unhappy with my purchase? I'm definitely looking forward to the number of games coming out for it in the future. Sure, I have to wait a few more months before those games comes out, but that's what the Blu Ray player is for.

We have a Wii at work. I've seen/played some of the games that utilize the Wiimote. For me, I don't think it's the control scheme that draws me into a game. For me, it's characters, story, stunning visuals, and a good soundtrack that sucks me in.

Another gripe I have for the Wii is the annoying interface. It's too childish for me. It's so big and dumb, imho. But I must admit, I love the overall look of the Wii console. Small and clean looking. Very influenced thru Apple's designs. But just like people are playing the "wait and see" game for the PS3, I'm doing the same for the Wii. Until there is a compelling game I must play on it, I will hold off. You say Twilight Princess...I say sure...Gamecube version. I can experience the same storyline, characters, gameplay, sound and visuals without having to mimmic in-game gestures...again, for me, gestures doesn't add to gameplay.

I'll argue that games will help sell a system. But right now, Sony has to get over their first generation titles which only demos the potential. Once game developers have more time to innovate and optimize their development cycle, we'll see more compelling games that push the next-gen hype.


MySpace Profile: SoCal Rider

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 4244
Location: New Orleans, ya heard me

Date: 2007-01-03 18:28:09 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

First of all, the games are rated E, for Everyone. I'm 25. Everyone I know who wants one of these is over 21. Even people who don't play video games want one. Tranquilized, how old are you? And yes, the Gamecube did in fact boost sales that much. Link: http://gamecube.gamezone.com/news/11_04_03_08_12AM.htm Nov., 2003 "ales figures gathered from the nation's largest retailers show that Nintendo GameCube effectively doubled its market share to 37 percent from 19 percent. The system now runs a strong second in the U.S. market as it challenges for leadership during the important holiday sales season." How do those words taste, asshole?


Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 485
Location:

Date: 2007-01-03 19:08:49 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

"And yes, the Gamecube did in fact boost sales that much. Link: http://gamecube.gamezone.com/news/11_04_03_08_12AM.htm Nov., 2003 "ales figures gathered from the nation's largest retailers show that Nintendo GameCube effectively doubled its market share to 37 percent from 19 percent. The system now runs a strong second in the U.S. market as it challenges for leadership during the important holiday sales season." How do those words taste, asshole?"

LOL not only are you a tool, you are a complete fucking retard that likes to twist facts for an agenda.  You are quoting an article from '03 that has little relevance to the long term sales figures of the GC.  THAT ARTICLE PROVES ONCE AGAIN THAT STATISTICS TAKEN OVER A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME ARE WORTHLESS!  What eventually happened?  Nintendo came in 3rd in the 6th generation console war, selling 21 million GCs, wwhile XBox sold 24 million and PS2 105 million (actually 111 million as of Sept. '06).  Seriously, I don't think you could have picked a more biased source to quote from. 


http://sis.slowli.com/images/4kv8te.gif

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 805
Location: San Diego, SoCal

Date: 2007-01-03 20:01:35 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

Funny, debating about video game consoles is like debating about choice vs. pro life!!! It always becomes dirty. Again, for me, it's about the games I enjoy playing. Whether it's on the Xbox, PS, or Nintendo game machine...I don't care! People get so attached to the machines, or look forward to justifying certain purchases, when really...it all comes down to enjoying what you like to play on your tv.

For some of us, we enjoy playing wave the magic wand...others like high tech features in our games...as for me, I like adventure role playing games as my main genre for console gaming. We're all different and that's why a variety of consoles is a good thing. Do we really care which company is more profitable? The way I see it...only if you're collecting on those profits.

I guess for me, that's why it's justified when I buy all of them. People call me crazy but hey, if I'm having fun doing what I'm doing, why should they hold that against me? Although it sounds like I'm Pro-PS3, I'm not. I will buy a Wii when there's a game I feel worth playing on it.

It's like people like to hate on things they can't have. Seriously, if the price of the PS3 wasn't an issue and there was a few games you thought was worth playing on it...wouldn't you buy it? Or would you hate it because it's a Sony product and we all know how much Sony sucks? It only sucks if you're not enjoying yourself on it...so again, that's all preference.

But I guess I can call myself lucky. I must admit, having to buy all of the new systems is spending a small fortune that not everyone can afford. But I think it's a little bit immature to hate on something you have very little experience with. Like someone told me, go play with the Wii and make your decisions off that. But if I've already done that and still feel like now is not the right time for me to buy into it...then you gotta give me that. Same for the PS3, if you feel it's too expensive or there's a lack of games for it, maybe you'll buy into it at a later date when you feel the time is right. Whether you like it or not, there will be games on each console that won't be availabe on another.


MySpace Profile: SoCal Rider

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 2999
Location: somewherenearcleveland

Date: 2007-01-04 13:33:31 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

well the thing is... Nintendo may be selling more... and they may indeed have more available units... but the thing is... Theres about 1 ps3 for every 3 nintendos... but the difference is, the nintendos can't stay on the shelf... The demand for the ps3 dropped dramatically. You still can't find a wii very easily.. but I can think of 4 stores off the top of my head that have the ps3 in stock and on the shelf right this very minute. The demand for the system is whats going to sell it... and right now, the only people buying it are the fanboys... not the casual gamer which makes up 80% of the market.. The other systems will always have the advantage because they are cheaper... Even if sony pulled a $100 price drop out of its ass, the xbox and wii would get price drops to counter that.
Keep in mind, when the dreamcast came out it had a buttload of titles on its "coming soon" list.... but as soon as the developers saw that the audience they were making games for was so small, that list of coming soon games stayed the only games out for that system, with very few releases past that... The demand for the ps3 couldn't be any worse. The holiday season proved that the only people buying it were people wanting to sell it on ebay.. Most of america wont be to keen to make everything in their living room hd for 5 or 6 more years... and by then people will already be talking of the next systems.. No one this day in age is going to spend $800 for a system Just so they can play tiger woods in hd.. Saying shit like "people will buy it to use their hd"  proves the point that your convinced that graphics sell the games/systems... and they really don't... if people want hd theres cheaper ways to do it than buy a ps3... xbox 360 can connect in hd, and you wont notice the image quality difference at all... if you want hd movies and tv shows and don't want to buy an hd player, you can download hd stuff from xbox lives market place.... no need to buy the hd dvd player.

Sports games are not the number 1 sellers.... I have worked in video game sales before... and sports games are never the big sellers... The big franchise games are the big sellers.... Games like mortal kombat, soul calibur, gears of war, gta, zelda, mario, and things of that nature... the sports games by ea, sell... but they are never sold the fuck out like a lot of other franchise games are..

Im not hating on sony just because its expensive... I just really agree with what a lot of financial analysts have said about it... If only I still had that article from the wall street journal... they had a list of reasons why the ps3 would fail in sales and as a whole... most of which you really can't disagree with...
Nintendo isn't set on doing their own thing, theres still 3rd party developers and games coming out for it... Im sure the continuing demand will pull developers in. None of nintendo's systems had large 3rd party support at launch... but  after the first year it picked up. Sony on the other hand I would say is set on doing their own thing... Selling a video game system for unheard of dollar amounts... pushing a media format that will go the way of the minidisc... Piling all kinds of features into the ps3 that will never get used merely to inflate the price for consumers... The sales and demand for the system at the moment are enough.... They may not have had that many systems at launch or available over the holiday... but they do now... and the ones that are on the shelves now aren't selling... When I bought my girlfriend that new zelda game for her wii yesterday I talked to the guy at best buy. He said the ps3 I was looking at had been on the floor since before new years... and the wii's were still selling out quicker than they could get them in stock... and thats the way it is all over the country... blaming the supply on sony's shitty sales isn't a factor... Im sure the supply they handed out wasn't a coincidence... there were a few analysts who said sony was expecting poor launch sales so they intentionally only released a smaller than originally intended quantity to artificially inflate demand... which worked.. and as you saw on ebay... the only people that bought it were the ones who wanted to sell it on ebay...
once the blueray format fails, the ps3 and its ultra expensive blue ray player are just going to be an overpriced waste of money.... what are you going to do with it when no one sells blue ray anymore? market analysts have predicted the dvd format war would be sorted out in 2 years... which falls into the life span of that system... so in 2 years when no one sells blue ray, whats the point of having a $500 feature in there that you wont use?
The ps3 as a whole is a big gamble... Sony is completly banking on fanboys to save them... The blue ray players sales are garbage on their own... so in the next year the ps3 fanboys are estimated to account for 1/2 of blue ray owners.. Sony had no desire to appease the mainstream audience.... sony went and did their own thing this time.. Nintendo wanted to appease everyone...
Sony has been doing a really shitty job of handling customer relations in the past few years and I think that will alienate their sales. The whole rootkit on your music cd's scare had people avoiding sony stuff at the stores.. and im sure it will hurt the sales of the blueray crap.. Supposedly there were even some digital cameras that had the rootkit on them... and theres a whole mess of people that wont buy anything sony anymore because of fear of rootkits or other bullshit included on them... There were even play station 2 games that had that rootkit on them.. I don't think it was too wise of that guy from sony who told the press they were going to be intentionally selling faulty systems at launch because they didn't have time to test all of them. sure sony replaced them... but who the fuck wants to buy something from the store broken out of the box and have to wait a month for them to get it right and mail you a new one? The issues with the batteries exploding... the company is really a mess... and I don't see any organizational improvements with the ps3..

The guys on wallstreet get paid to predict the outcomes of shit like this... so I'll believe what they say... dreamcast all over again... pout, cry, fanboy rant all you want.... sony fucked up... The fact that you can go to the store right now and buy one despite their low quantity should be proof enough that no ones going to buy it.... Theres only sooo many people dedicated to buying sony stuff... Theres not enough suckers born every minute to keep the system going.


I'll support dans comp till bmx companies start selling direct to their customers...

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 805
Location: San Diego, SoCal

Date: 2007-01-04 16:03:08 Topic: Re: Nintendo wii

Wow...for argument's sake for blu ray, Sony isn't using that just for movies alone on the PS3. The storage capacity will be taken advantage of once more HD games are released. How so? Well, HD games require higher resolution textures. Higher resolution textures require more disk space. In some respect, I think MS is limiting their HD game potential for not supporting games to be played through the HD DVD addon. So even if Blu Ray as a movie format fails, I doubt that will hinder the use of Blu ray for games.

The problems with analyists are, sometimes, they don't know enough about the game industry and only spout what they read on blogs or initial jerk reactions. Sure, developing for the PS3 or 360 is expensive, but don't see large amounts of studios dropping development on them. I think it's an ignorant thing to assume. You'll just see more cross platform games. As for the studios that do drop their next gen projects, let's really look at those studios. The ones that have are studios I've never heard of.

You can write off Sony now based off of your own assumptions...but I honestly don't think they will go anywhere. And to compare the PS3 with the dreamcast, I think you're a bit off there. The dreamcast had bigger problems to deal with and never overcame them. And they didn't have the marketting team like Sony does. Sure, there's PS3s on shelves but you have to realize the 360 went through the same problems. Look at the 360 today. If you compare the two, the cost between them isn't all that far off. If people are willing to buy a 360, I believe there are those who are willing to spend a little more to pick up a PS3 which is a complete package if they're really interested in the HD technology.

As for downloading movies...that would be my last option. And with the 360's small 20 gig hard drive, it's very limiting. If I want to watch HD content, I want to do it now, I don't want to have to wait for my download to finish. I am willing to pay a little more for the HD content as it's not much more than regular DVDs. I'm sure there's a lot more people like me who feel the same way...not just fanboys.

I say give the PS3 a year or so. If nothing changes, then you can shove it down my throat then. But for now, I'm keeping an open mind.


MySpace Profile: SoCal Rider
Sponsored Results
<< Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 Next >> Reply New Thread