Politics/Religion

Joined: A long time ago...

Let me first say that I am making no assumptions here of any grand conspiracy involving the Illuminati trying to strike fear into us to enslave us. I'm not trying to offer any explanation, but just show everyone that the govt's theory is very very flawed. And the fact that they are not investigating to find the true cause of the WTC collapse is disturbing. That's all I'm saying with this post. So please try to keep the discussion to the collapse of the buildings, and whether or not you can still say that the govt's "pancake theory" is possible.

If the pancake theory (the govt's explanation) is true, then there would have been all kinds of friction and resistance involved in the collapse. You would expect that the buildings would fall, under these conditions, at much less than freefall speeds, but it turns out that they did not. If you would have tossed a bowling bowl off the top of each WTC as it began to collapse, the ball and the building would have been at ground level at the same time.

Again, the facts, the evidence, and what is know about the physical world contradicts the official explanation. I don't know about you, but I'm pretty sure that the laws of nature didn't suspend themselves on 9-11.


http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html

Basically, the building came down even faster than gravity could have done alone. A controlled demolition is the only way that is possible.
Feel free to say "fires from the planes hitting the building brought it down" and stand by that explanation, but that still doesn't explain the building that came down that wasn't hit by a plane.
Of course the govt's explanation of that one is that
FEMA released a report saying debris from one of the collapsing towers traveled 355 ft, through building 6, catching building 7 on fire, thus collapsing it. It fell at 5 pm that day. Must've been one hell of a fire, that apparently no one saw.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7.html


I like how everyone dismisses it as "conspiracy theory garbage" but I would love for someone to explain the flaw in this. Please click the link and at least tell what you think about this. Because this is scientific fact showing that the govt's explanation is flawed, if not complete bullshit. If you still believe the govt's theory is not at least flawed, I would love to know why.

Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government. -Jean Jacques Rousseau

Joined: A long time ago...

That pancake theory is very hard to ignore... Why isn't this in the news?

Joined: A long time ago...

I showed this to my boss, and he's an electrical engineer, but still has a good mechanical engineering background... and he's absolutly stunned people havn't noticed that and made a big deal out of it... He said he knew since day 1 that a plane couldn't have taken that building down the way it did.

Joined: A long time ago...

It seems 9/11 remains a focal point and with good reason. For anyone who needs absolute proof, we will never convince them. Nor do we need to.

Why would I need to prove anything to anyone? I can just show where the official story does not hold true. Once you accept the official story is false, you move forward.

The truth is always the truth.

Joined: A long time ago...

I dont know if any of you have been to ground zero,but there is one flaw in the "controled blast" theory.The bottom 7 floors of the wtc towers are below the hudson river,the foundation actually holds back the river.
So, for this theory to work the charge would have to be in the "basement". Now if enough explosives were planted to bring down just 1 tower,the foundation walls would have been wiped out, or at least heavily damaged,unlesss the explosives were placed farthest away from the water side of the building,which would make it tip.
As for the debris traveling 360' across vasser st.you do realise that vasser st. is one way(about 30' across)and im sure that there was enough displaced energy to achieve that.just seeing the destruction in the days following to the surrounding buildings, I mean the media concentrates on the towers, but every building surrounding g.z. was just fuckin destroyed.The way the guy writing the article makes it seem like the towers fell,and everything surrounding them is open for business,and the buildings are spread out.Believe me when I tell you,shit down ther is CRAMPED.

myspace.com/jimbo420bmx