Seshin Bike Co

Politics/Religion

Administration's Iraq lies

Reply New Thread

Related Searches:

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 3110
Location: Cleveland OH area

Date: 2006-01-06 09:52:05 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

All statements and quotes have sources, just scroll all the way to the bottom.
Read it and then say the Bush administration isn't full of shit, if you actually still think they've done a good job.

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v27/n03/wein01_.html

edit:
here's a few i found quite interesting:

I heard Donald Rumsfeld say: ‘I don’t believe anyone that I know in the administration ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons.’

I heard Donald Rumsfeld say: ‘The Coalition did not act in Iraq because we had discovered dramatic new evidence of Iraq’s pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. We acted because we saw the evidence in a dramatic new light, through the prism of our experience on 9/11.’

I heard a reporter say to Donald Rumsfeld: ‘Before the war in Iraq, you stated the case very eloquently and you said they would welcome us with open arms.’ And I heard Rumsfeld interrupt him: ‘Never said that. Never did. You may remember it well, but you’re thinking of somebody else. You can’t find, anywhere, me saying anything like either of those two things you just said I said.’

heard a reporter ask Donald Rumsfeld: ‘If they did not have WMDs, why did they pose an immediate threat to this country?’ I heard Rumsfeld answer: ‘You and a few other critics are the only people I’ve heard use the phrase “immediate threat”. It’s become a kind of folklore that that’s what happened. If you have any citations, I’d like to see them.’ And I heard the reporter read: ‘No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people.’ Rumsfeld replied: ‘It – my view of – of the situation was that he – he had – we – we believe, the best intelligence that we had and other countries had and that – that we believed and we still do not know – we will know.’


I heard Ahmed Chalabi, who had supplied most of the information about the weapons of mass destruction, shrug and say: ‘We are heroes in error . . . What was said before is not important.’

I heard Paul Wolfowitz say: ‘For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, as justification for invading Iraq, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on.’

I heard Condoleezza Rice continue to insist: ‘It’s not as if anybody believes that Saddam Hussein was without weapons of mass destruction.’

heard Donald Rumsfeld say: ‘I don’t believe it’s our job to reconstruct that country. The Iraqi people are going to have to reconstruct that country over a period of time.’ I heard him say that, in any event, ‘the infrastructure of that country was not terribly damaged by the war at all.’




I heard in the last year alone, the US had fired 127 tons of depleted uranium (DU) munitions in Iraq, the radioactive equivalent of approximately ten thousand Nagasaki bombs. I heard that the widespread use of DU in the first Gulf War was believed to be the primary cause of the health problems suffered by its 580,400 veterans, of whom 467 were wounded during the war itself. Ten years later, 11,000 were dead and 325,000 on medical disability. DU carried in semen led to high rates of endometriosis in their wives and girlfriends, often requiring hysterectomies. Of soldiers who had healthy babies before the war, 67 per cent of their postwar babies were born with severe defects, including missing legs, arms, organs or eyes."

I heard 380 tons of HMX (high melting point explosive) and RDX (rapid detonation explosive) were missing from al-Qaqaa, one of Iraq’s ‘most sensitive military installations’, which had not been guarded since the invasion. I heard that one pound of these explosives was enough to blow up a 747 jet, and that this cache could be used to make a million roadside bombs, which were the cause of half the casualties among US troops."




Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government. -Jean Jacques Rousseau

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 3110
Location: Cleveland OH area

Date: 2006-01-11 05:48:29 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

Okay, if no one has any comments on the stupidity of our administration, and how they are tripped up in their lies by reporters...

Has anyone read any other work by this author? Or bothered to check out any of her books?

Maybe this was too long for me to expect anyone on a bmx forum to read. But these are quotes direct from our administration. If people don't see how rediculous they seem when you look, on a timeline format like this link I posted, at what they were telling us...

No one has any opinion on these quotes from Rumsfeld? Denying that he ever said Iraq was an immediate threat, only to have the reporter read back to him exactly what he said about Iraq being an immediate threat... :?




Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government. -Jean Jacques Rousseau

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 220
Location: the internet

Date: 2006-01-11 16:49:26 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

I see what you're trying to get across, and I completely agree with it. But riding > reading, and thus, most people won't bother with this. :?

But yeah, the administration has been talking in circles since roughly, 4 days of them coming to power. America is continually being fast-talked into allowing the administration to do whatever they want. Unless America wakes up, and wakes up fast, we may end up pretty screwed. :cry:


My bike sucks... But it's all I got!

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 152
Location: Chambly,Quebec,Canada

Date: 2006-01-18 22:49:50 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

You know whats funny. I knew Bush was going to win his second term. This whole thing has just shown how Americans are easily seduced by fear and hope of safety. I never understodd how they could better their National Security by going to another country. I mean if the attack on 9/11 was the big wake up call, and that terrorists were able to attack the heartland, then wouldn't it have been apparent to everyone that they didn't have WMD's. I mean they attacked us with our own 747's....How is that a sign that they have WMD's. And where was there proof after the fact...they had to invade Iraq to find out, and they didn't find shit. And then it just seemed apparent, oh well as long as were next to Afganistan, we must as well invade and look for terrorists. It's ridiculous. And as if he didn't spend enough money by that point, let's beef up security at home....Hello!? That's what the fucking idiot should have done in the first place, and he didn't even do that. With the implication of those policies all he did was violate the constition, which is supposedly what America is all about. Oh I guess we'll also introduce these terrorists colors. WHAT THE FUCK is a high-level of terrorist attack mean! How did that stupid ass meter work, what information was collected, and from where to have them changing the threat level all the time. I mean if there was any information collected that would raise it, they should know where, or what or how. But no, it just means, oh high level of threat, continue your day in fear because, somewhere at some place, at some time, something bad MIGHT happen, WTF is that. Honestly being president must not be easy, but I don't think Bush's mind has even been on resolving any of these issues, but rather resolving more personal agendas. I just hope the next person who gets put in office, pulls out the soldiers, stops this whole fucking war BS. and concentrates on fixing America, I am peronally not caring, the Canadian dollar is almost worth as much as the American, but I mean, your guys' economy is fucked, your out two towers, a large peice of the Pentagon, the entire New Orleans and Katrina incident, and what have you got to show for it? You don't even have Osama, you had to settle for Saddam. 9/11 got as side-tracked as one of the topics on these forums. Horrible.

Terra Flata


Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 220
Location: the internet

Date: 2006-01-19 20:10:01 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

Yeah... It's a shame, but fear will often cause people to follow blindly.


My bike sucks... But it's all I got!

Joined: A long time ago...


Posts: 3110
Location: Cleveland OH area

Date: 2006-01-23 10:06:08 Direct Link: Administration's Iraq lies

Yeah... It's a shame, but fear will often cause people to follow blindly.


That's been the entire Bush theme. Create fear, then capitalize on it by expanding govt. powers, infringing on Constitutional rights of citizens, and starting wars that are absolutely unneccessary.




Frequent punishments are always a sign of weakness or laziness on the part of a government. -Jean Jacques Rousseau
Sponsored Results
Reply New Thread